Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009.

o  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                  to                   .

Commission File Number 001-32472

TGC INDUSTRIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  (972) 881-1099

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to be submit and post such files).  Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

Reference is made to the succeeding pages for the following financial information:

2

Table of Contents

TGC INDUSTRIES, INC.

BALANCE SHEETS

See Notes to Financial Statements

3

Table of Contents

TGC INDUSTRIES, INC.

BALANCE SHEETS — CONTINUED

See Notes to Financial Statements

4

Table of Contents

TGC INDUSTRIES, INC.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)

See Notes to Financial Statements

5

Table of Contents

TGC INDUSTRIES, INC.

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

See Notes to Financial Statements

6

Table of Contents

TGC INDUSTRIES, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2009

NOTE A

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the financial information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.  References to “we,” “us,” “our,” “its,” or the “Company” refer to TGC Industries, Inc.

In connection with the preparation of these financial statements, the Company evaluated subsequent events after the balance sheet date of September 30, 2009, through November 9, 2009, the date these financial statements were issued.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

Seismic Surveys

The Company provides seismic data acquisition survey services to its customers under general service agreements which define certain obligations for the Company and for its customers.  A supplemental agreement setting forth the terms of a specific project, which may be cancelled by either party upon 30 days’ advance written notice, is entered into for every project.  These supplemental agreements are either “turnkey” agreements providing for a fixed fee to be paid for each unit of seismic data acquired or “term” agreements providing for a fixed hourly, daily, or monthly fee during the term of the project.  The duration of these projects will vary from a few days to several months.  The Company recognizes revenue when services are performed under both types of agreements.  Services are defined as the commencement of data acquisition.  Under turnkey agreements, the total number of units of seismic data to be gathered is set forth in the agreement and revenue is recognized as services are performed on a per unit of seismic data acquired rate.  Under term agreements, revenue is recognized as services are performed based on the time worked rate provided in the term agreement.  Under both turnkey and term agreements, cost of earned revenue is recognized by multiplying total estimated agreement cost by the percentage-of-completion of the agreement.  The excess of that amount over the cost of earned revenue reported in prior periods is recognized as cost of earned revenue for the period.  Agreements are not segmented or combined for purposes of calculating percentage of completion.  The asset, “Cost and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts” represents cost incurred on turnkey agreements in excess of billings on those agreements.  The liability, “Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts” represents billings on turnkey agreements in excess of cost on those agreements.  Claims have been negligible in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 and the year ended December 31, 2008.

Gravity Data

The Company owns a data bank which contains gravity data, and to a lesser extent magnetic data, from many of the major oil and natural gas producing areas located within the United States.  When an order for gravity data is received, the portion of gravity data requested by the customer is prepared in digital format for licensing and shipment to the customer.  This process is performed by an employee in the Company’s headquarters office and is normally completed within a few days.  The licensing of gravity data is not a material part of the Company’s revenue.  Gravity data revenue during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, was approximately $11,900.  Gravity revenue for the year ended December 31, 2008, was approximately $46,100.

7

Table of Contents

CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING ESTIMATE

Management evaluates its estimates on a routine basis.  Effective July 1, 2007, the Company revised the estimated useful lives of certain seismic equipment and related components.  The Company purchased this new equipment from November 2004 through June 2007.  Management employed this equipment in operations for an average holding period of one year as of July 1, 2007.  Based on the information gained from operations during this holding period, management believes that this equipment will benefit periods ranging from 5 to 7 years, beginning at the point the assets were originally placed in service.  The original estimated useful lives ranged from 3 to 5 years.

The net book value of this equipment at June 30, 2007, was not modified and is amortized over the revised estimated useful lives of the equipment.  The Company does not believe that this equipment will become obsolete at the end of the original estimate and has revised the estimated life of these assets.  The effect to depreciation expense, net income and earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, is:

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “ASC”) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP. Rules and interpretative releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) are also sources of authoritative U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. The ASC became effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009 and superseded all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the ASC became non-authoritative.  The Company adopted the ASC effective September 30, 2009, and, other than the manner in which new accounting guidance is referenced, the adoption of the ASC had no impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or notes to the financial statements.

NOTE B — MANAGEMENT PRESENTATION

In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations, and changes in financial position have been included.  The results of the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the entire year.  For further information, refer to the financial statements and the footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on Form 10-K.

8

Table of Contents

NOTE C — EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per common share are based upon the weighted average number of shares of common stock (“common shares”) outstanding.  Diluted earnings per share are based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and, when dilutive, common shares issuable for stock options, warrants, and convertible securities.  All earnings per common share for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 have been adjusted for the 5% stock dividend paid May 12, 2009, to shareholders of record as of April 28, 2009.

The following is a reconciliation of net income and weighted average common shares outstanding for purposes of calculating basic and diluted earnings per share common share:

NOTE D — DIVIDENDS

On April 16, 2009, the Company declared a five percent (5%) stock dividend on its outstanding common shares.  The 5% stock dividend was paid on May 12, 2009, to shareholders of record as of April 28, 2009.  Cash in lieu of fractional shares in the total amount of $385.50 was paid to shareholders based on the last sales price of the Company’s common shares on the record date.

9

Table of Contents

NOTE E — INCOME TAXES

Deferred income taxes reflect the impact of temporary differences between the amounts of assets and liabilities recognized for financial reporting purposes and such amounts recognized for tax purposes.  In addition, the Company paid, during the first nine months of 2009, federal and various state estimated income taxes for tax year 2009, as well as various state income taxes for tax year 2008.

NOTE F — STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for its stock options under the recognition and measurement principles of the then existing accounting standards and related interpretations.  Accordingly, no stock-based employee compensation cost was reflected in our financial statements prior to January 1, 2006, since all options to purchase common shares of the Company had an exercise price equal to, or greater than, the market value of the underlying common shares on the date of grant.

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock-based compensation awards granted after that date and for unvested awards outstanding at that date using the modified prospective application method.  Accordingly, we recognized the fair value of the stock-based compensation awards as wages in the Statements of Income on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.  Such implementation is expected to have minimal impact on our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.  We have recognized compensation expense, relative to stock-based awards, in wages in the Statements of Operations of approximately $63,000 and $112,000, less than $0.01 per share, for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively and approximately $286,000 and $322,000, or approximately $.02 per share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.  Prior period amounts were not restated to reflect the recognition of stock-based compensation costs.

As of September 30, 2009, there was approximately $457,000 of unrecognized compensation expense related to our 2006 Stock Awards Plan and no unrecognized compensation expense related to our 1999 Stock Option Plan.

NOTE G - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On October 19, 2009, we disclosed our entry into a Material Definitive Agreement regarding the acquisition of Eagle Canada, Inc.

Eagle Geophysical, Inc. and Eagle Geophysical Onshore, Inc. (the “Debtors”) are currently debtors in a Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding in Houston, Texas.  Eagle Canada, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Eagle Canada”), is in the business of providing seismic data and surveying services to the Canadian energy industry and has its principal place of business located in Calgary, Alberta, Canada.  Eagle Canada, which was not involved in the bankruptcy proceeding in Houston, Texas, was a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Debtors.  By Order dated October 14, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court approved the sale of the Eagle Canada stock by the Debtors to TGC Industries, Inc. (“TGC”) and authorized the Debtors to enter into a Stock Purchase Agreement with TGC which was executed on October 16, 2009.  In accordance with the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, the sale transaction closed on October 16, 2009, with TGC acquiring the Eagle Canada stock for a total purchase price of approximately $10.3 million paid from existing cash.  Eagle Canada generated revenues of approximately $26.5 million in 2008.

10

Table of Contents

ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. Portions of this document that are not statements of historical or current fact are forward-looking statements that involve risk and uncertainties, such as statements of our plans, objectives, expectations, and intentions. The cautionary statements made in this Form 10-Q should be read as applying to all related forward-looking statements wherever they appear in this Form 10-Q. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our anticipated results include those discussed in Part II, Item 1A. “RISK FACTORS.”

Forward Looking Statements

This report includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this report regarding the Company’s strategies and plans for growth are forward-looking statements.  These forward-looking statements are often characterized by the terms “may,” “will,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “target,” and other words and terms of similar meanings and do not reflect historical facts.  Although management believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct.  Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such expectations are disclosed in the Company’s Securities and Exchange Commission filings, and include, but are not limited to, the dependence upon energy industry spending for seismic services, the unpredictable nature of forecasting weather, the potential for contract delay or cancellation, the potential for fluctuations in oil and gas prices, the availability of capital resources, and the current economic downturn which could adversely affect our revenues and cash flow if our customers, and/or potential customers, become unable to pay, or must delay payment of,  amounts owing to the Company because such customers are not successful in generating revenues or are precluded from securing necessary financing.  The forward-looking statements contained herein reflect the current views of the Company’s management, and the Company assumes no obligation to update the forward-looking statements or to update the reasons actual results could differ from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements.

Executive Overview

The Company is a leading provider of seismic data acquisition services throughout the continental United States.  Although we operated nine crews during the first quarter, we have reduced our crew count to five crews at the end of the second quarter and operated four crews throughout the third quarter, as we continued to optimize our utilization, keeping our crew count in line with demand.  While we expect the balance of this year to remain challenging, we are experiencing an increased level of inquiries and we are also seeing an increase in bidding for seismic work.  Given our current backlog, we expect to operate four crews during the fourth quarter, in line with our third quarter level.

These seismic crews supply seismic data to companies engaged in the domestic exploration and development of oil and natural gas on land and in land-to-water transition areas. Our customers rely on seismic data to identify areas where subsurface conditions are favorable for the accumulation of existing hydrocarbons, to optimize the development and production of hydrocarbon reservoirs, to better delineate existing oil and natural gas fields, and to augment reservoir management techniques.

11

Table of Contents

We acquire geophysical data using the latest in 3-D survey techniques. We introduce acoustic energy into the ground by using vibration equipment or dynamite detonation, depending on the surface terrain and subsurface requirements. The reflected energy, or echoes, is received through geophones, converted into a digital signal at a multi-channel recording unit, and then transmitted to a central recording vehicle. Subsurface requirements dictate the number of channels necessary to perform our services. With our state-of-the-art seismic equipment, including computer technology and multiple channels, we acquire, on a cost effective basis, immense volumes of seismic data that when processed and interpreted produce more precise images of the earth’s subsurface. Our customers then use our seismic data to generate 3-D geologic models that help reduce finding costs and improve recovery rates from existing wells.

We provide our seismic data acquisition services primarily to domestic onshore oil and natural gas exploration and development companies for use in the onshore drilling and production of oil and natural gas in the continental United States. The main factors influencing demand for seismic data acquisition services in our industry are the level of drilling activity by oil and natural gas companies and the sizes of such companies’ exploration and development budgets, which, in turn, depend largely on current and anticipated future crude oil and natural gas prices and depletion rates.

Our customers are major and independent oil and natural gas exploration and development companies.  The services we provide to our customers vary according to the size and needs of each customer. Our services are marketed by supervisory and executive personnel who contact customers to determine their needs and respond to customer inquiries regarding the availability of crews. Contacts are based principally upon professional relationships developed over a number of years. There are a number of consultants in the oil and natural gas industry who process and interpret seismic data for oil and natural gas companies. These consultants can have an influence in determining which company their customers use to acquire seismic data.

The acquisition of seismic data for the oil and natural gas industry is a highly competitive business.  Contracts for such services generally are awarded on the basis of price quotations, crew experience, and the availability of crews to perform in a timely manner, although factors other than price, such as crew safety performance history, and technological and operational expertise, are often determinative. Our competitors include companies with financial resources that are significantly greater than our own as well as companies of comparable and smaller size. Our primary competitors are Dawson Geophysical Company, Geo Kinetics, Inc., and CGG-Veritas.  These competitors are publicly-traded companies with long operating histories who field numerous crews and work in a number of different regions and terrain.  In addition to the previously named companies, we also compete for projects from time to time with smaller seismic companies which operate in local markets with only one or two crews and often specialize in specific regions or type of operations.  We believe that our long-term industry expertise, the customer relationships developed over our history, and our financial stability give us an advantage over most of our competitors in the industry.

Results of Operations

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009, Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 (Unaudited)

Revenues.  Our revenues were $74,685,172 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to $62,644,731 for the same period of 2008, an increase of 19.2%.  This increase in revenues was attributable to several factors including an increase in crew productivity, additional shot-hole revenue, favorable weather conditions, our operation of nine seismic crews during the first three months of 2009 compared to eight crews for the same period of 2008, and first quarter 2009 revenues exceeding first quarter 2008 revenues by $13,540,187.

Cost of services.  Our cost of services was $51,931,010 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to $40,800,341 for the same period of 2008, an increase of 27.3%.  This increase was principally attributable to pricing pressures as a result of the industry wide slow-down and increased operating expenses due to an unusually

12

Table of Contents

high level of shot-hole projects.  As a percentage of revenues, cost of services was 69.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to 65.1% for the same period of 2008.

Selling, general, and administrative expenses.  SG&A expenses were $3,136,509 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to $3,045,079 for the same period of 2008, an increase of 3.0%.  This increase was primarily attributable to additional expenses associated with additional selling and administrative personnel in the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to the same period of 2008.  SG&A expense as a percentage of revenues was 4.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared with 4.9% for the same period of 2008.

Depreciation and amortization expense.  Depreciation and amortization expense was $10,881,764 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to $10,132,918 for the same period of 2008, an increase of 7.4%.  This increase was primarily attributable to additions of new seismic recording equipment and vibration vehicles during the second half of 2008.  Depreciation and amortization expense as a percentage of revenues was 14.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to 16.2% for the same period of 2008.  For further information, refer to Note A to Financial Statements - Change in Accounting Estimate in Item 1 above.

Income from operations.  Income from operations was $8,735,889 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to $8,666,393 for the same period of 2008, an increase of 0.8%.  This increase was primarily attributable an increase in revenue, partially offset by increases in cost of services, SG&A and depreciation expense.  EBITDA increased $818,342 to $19,617,653 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, from $18,799,311 for the same period of 2008, an increase of 4.4%.  This increase was a result of an increase in depreciation and amortization expense of $748,846, an increase in interest expense of $167,358 and an increase in income tax expense of $72,668, partially offset by a decrease in net income of $170,530.  For a definition of EBITDA, a reconciliation of EBITDA to net income, and discussion of EBITDA, please refer to the section entitled “EBITDA” found below.

Interest expense.  Interest expense was $782,711 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to $615,353 for the same period of 2008, an increase of 27.2%.  This increase was primarily attributable to the additional debt incurred during the second half of 2008 for the purchase of our eighth ARAM ARIES (“ARAM”) seismic recording system, 7,000 additional recording channels, and 13 new vibration vehicles.

Income tax expense.  Income tax expense was $3,410,612 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to $3,337,944  for the same period of 2008.  The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, was 42.9% compared to 41.5% for the same period of 2008.  See Note E of Notes to Financial Statements in Item 1.

Three Months Ended September 30, 2009, Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 (Unaudited)

Revenues.  Our revenues were $16,083,161 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, compared to $21,553,653 for the same period of 2008, a decrease of 25.4%.  This decrease in revenues was primarily attributable to lower overall demand, a competitive pricing environment for domestic seismic services,  and uncertainty regarding future energy policy in the United States.

Cost of services.  Our cost of services was $14,120,847 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, compared to $13,373,764 for the same period of 2008, an increase of 5.6%.  This increase was primarily attributable to pricing pressures as a result of the industry wide slow-down and an unusually high amount of shot-hole work during the third quarter of 2009 compared with an unusually low amount of shot-hole work during the third quarter of 2008.  Shot-hole contracts typically contain higher third-party costs when compared to vibroseis work.  As a percentage of revenues, cost of services was 87.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to 62.0% for the same period of 2008.

13

Table of Contents

Selling, general, and administrative expenses.  SG&A expenses were $994,643 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, compared to $1,125,128 for the same period of 2008, a decrease of 11.6%.  This decrease was primarily attributable to enhanced cost control measures implemented during the current economic slow-down. SG&A expense as a percentage of revenues was 6.2% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared with 5.2% for the same period of 2008 due to a 25.4% decrease in revenues between the two periods.

Depreciation and amortization expense.  Depreciation and amortization expense was $3,449,011 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, essentially flat compared to $3,451,571 for the same period of 2008.

Income(loss) from operations.  Loss from operations was ($2,481,340) for the three months ended September 30, 2009, compared to income from operations of $3,603,190 for the same period of 2008.  The loss from operations was primarily attributable to a $5,470,492 decrease in revenues and a $747,083 increase in cost of services as discussed above.  EBITDA decreased $6,087,090 to $967,671 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, from $7,054,761 for the same period of 2008, a decrease of 86.3%.  This decrease was a result of factors discussed above.  For a definition of EBITDA, a reconciliation of EBITDA to net income, and discussion of EBITDA, please refer to the section entitled “EBITDA” found below.

Interest expense.  Interest expense was essentially flat at $245,751 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, compared to $245,429 for the same period of 2008.

Income tax (benefit) expense.  Income tax benefit was ($992,726) for the three months ended September 30, 2009, compared to income tax expense of $1,494,972 for the same period of 2008.  The effective tax benefit rate was 36.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to income tax expense rate of 44.5% for the same period of 2008.  See Note E of Notes to Financial Statements in Item 1.

EBITDA

We define EBITDA as net income (loss) plus interest expense, income taxes, and depreciation and amortization expense. We use EBITDA as a supplemental financial measure to assess:

·              the financial performance of our assets without regard to financing methods, capital structures, taxes, or historical cost basis;

·              our liquidity and operating performance over time and in relation to other companies that own similar assets and that we believe calculate EBITDA in a manner similar to us; and

·              the ability of our assets to generate cash sufficient for us to pay potential interest costs.

We also understand that such data is used by investors to assess our performance. However, EBITDA is not a measure of operating income (loss), operating performance, or liquidity presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. When assessing our operating performance or our liquidity, you should not consider this data in isolation or as a substitute for our net income (loss), cash flow from operating activities, or other cash flow data calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  EBITDA excludes some, but not all, items that affect net income (loss) and operating income (loss), and these measures may vary among other companies.  Therefore, EBITDA as presented below may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.  Further, the results presented by EBITDA cannot be achieved without incurring the costs that the measure excludes: interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.

14

Table of Contents

The following table reconciles our EBITDA to our net income:

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flows

Cash flows from operating activities.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $16,426,345 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to $20,985,425 for the same period of 2008.  The $4,559,080 decrease in the first nine months of 2009 from the same period of 2008 was principally attributable to timing of billings and revenue recognition, the collections of accounts receivable, the timing of receipts and payment of invoices, federal and state income taxes payable, and the mix of contracts.

Working capital increased $10,376,144 to $27,345,187 as of September 30, 2009, from the December 31, 2008 working capital of $16,969,043.  This increase was primarily due to a $10,030,603 increase in cash and cash equivalents, a $595,888 increase in prepaid expenses and other, a $2,339,588 decrease in trade accounts payable, a decrease in billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts of $4,395,478, a decrease in the current portion of capital lease obligations of $251,310 partially offset by a $327,166 decrease in trade accounts receivable, a $2,039,489 decrease in cost and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts, a decrease in prepaid federal and state income taxes of $1,220,154, a $627,808 increase in accrued liabilities, an increase in federal and state income taxes payable of $2,326,264 and an increase in the current portion of debt obligations of $695,842.

Cash flows used in investing activities.

Net cash used in investing activities was $555,745 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, and $2,369,867 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.  This decrease was due primarily to a decrease in capital expenditures of $1,701,749.

Cash flows used in financing activities.

Net cash used in financing activities was $5,839,997 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, and $5,967,716 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.  The decrease was due primarily to a decrease in the amount of principal payments on capital lease obligations of $223,617 partially offset by an increase in the amount of principal payments on our outstanding notes payable of $105,940.

15

Table of Contents

Capital expenditures.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company acquired $1,291,181 of additional  equipment and vehicles.  Cash of $857,536 and capital lease obligations from a vehicle leasing company of $433,645 were used to finance these acquisitions.  Although we do not budget for our capital expenditures, we may purchase additional equipment during 2009 should the demand for our services increase.

Liquidity

Our primary source of liquidity is cash generated from operations and short-term borrowings from commercial banks and equipment lenders.  Based on current forecasts, we believe that we have sufficient available cash and borrowing capacity to fund our working capital needs over the next 12 months.

Capital Resources

Since 2005, we have relied on cash generated from operations, short-term borrowings from commercial banks and equipment lenders, and proceeds from a public offering of our common shares to fund our working capital requirements and capital expenditures.

In April of 2005, we entered into a revolving credit agreement with a commercial bank.  Effective September 16, 2006, we renewed our revolving credit agreement and increased the borrowing limit from $3,500,000 to $5,000,000.  The borrowing limit under that revolving line of credit agreement remains at $5,000,000, and was renewed on September 16, 2007, September 16, 2008, and September 16, 2009, respectively.  The revolving line of credit agreement does not expire until September 16, 2010.  Our obligations under this agreement are secured by a security interest in our accounts receivable.  Interest on the outstanding amount under the revolving credit agreement is payable monthly at the greater of 5.00% or the prime rate of interest.  The credit loan agreement provides for non-financial and financial covenants including a minimum debt service coverage ratio in excess of 2.0 to 1.0 and a ratio of debt to worth not in excess of 1.25 to 1.0.  As of September 30, 2009, we had no borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit agreement.

In April of 2004, we executed an addendum to our lease of a facility in Plano, Texas, that included approximately 10,500 square feet of office and warehouse space and an outdoor storage area of approximately 20,000 square feet.  This facility was used to repair geophysical equipment and housed our corporate offices until September of 2006.  In September of 2005, we leased an additional facility, in Plano, Texas, with approximately 10,000 square feet of office and warehouse space and an additional 10,000 square feet of outdoor storage.  This facility was used primarily to repair geophysical equipment.  In January of 2006, we leased a 600-square foot facility in Houston, Texas, for use as a sales office.  In July of 2006, we entered into a lease for 7,269 square feet of office space located in Plano, Texas.  In September of 2006, we relocated our corporate offices to this facility.  This lease was modified in September of 2008 to include an additional 1,254 square feet for a total of 8,523 square feet of office space located in Plano, Texas.  In October of 2006 we leased an 800-square foot facility in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for use as a sales office.  In September of 2007, we leased a 1,130-square foot facility in Denver, Colorado, for use as a sales office.  We did not renew the lease on the Denver office upon its expiration on August 31, 2009.  In September of 2008, we leased a 400-square foot facility in Pratt, Kansas, to be used as a permit office.  In November of 2008, we vacated our two Plano repair, warehouse and outdoor storage facilities and moved to a leased repair, warehouse and outside storage facility in Denison, Texas.  The Denison, Texas, facility consists of one 5,000-square foot building, two 10,000-square foot adjacent buildings and an outdoor storage area of approximately 60,500 square feet.

16

Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations

We believe that our capital resources, including our short-term investments, funds available under our revolving credit agreement and cash flow from operations will be adequate to meet our current operational needs. We believe that we will be able to finance our 2009 capital expenditures through cash flow from operations, borrowings from commercial lenders, and the funds available under our line of credit loan agreement.  However, our ability to satisfy working capital requirements, meet debt repayment obligations, and fund future capital requirements will depend principally upon our future operating performance, which is subject to the risks inherent in our business, and will also depend on the extent to which the current economic downturn adversely affects the ability of our customers, and/or potential customers, to pay promptly amounts owing to the Company under their service contracts with us.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of September 30, 2009, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Critical Accounting Policies

A discussion of our critical accounting policies can be found in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.  There have been no material changes to these policies (including critical accounting estimates and assumptions or judgments affecting the application of those estimates and assumptions) during the first nine months of 2009.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

A discussion of recently issued accounting pronouncements can be found in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.

Recent Events

On October 19, 2009, we disclosed our entry into a Material Definitive Agreement regarding the acquisition of Eagle Canada, Inc.

Eagle Geophysical, Inc. and Eagle Geophysical Onshore, Inc. (the “Debtors”) are currently debtors in a Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding in Houston, Texas.  Eagle Canada, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Eagle Canada”), is in the business of providing seismic data and surveying services to the Canadian energy industry and has its principal place of business located in Calgary, Alberta, Canada.  Eagle Canada, which was not involved in the bankruptcy proceeding in Houston, Texas, was a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Debtors.  By Order dated October 14, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court approved the sale of the Eagle Canada stock by the Debtors to TGC Industries, Inc. (“TGC”) and authorized the Debtors to enter into a Stock Purchase Agreement with TGC which was executed on October 16, 2009.  In accordance with the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, the sale transaction closed on October 16, 2009, with TGC acquiring the Eagle Canada stock for a total purchase price of approximately $10.3 million paid from existing cash.  Eagle Canada generated revenues of approximately $26.5 million in 2008.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

We have not entered into any hedging agreements or swap agreements.  Our principal market risks include fluctuations in commodity prices which affect demand for and pricing for our services and the risk related to the concentration of our customers in the oil and natural gas industry.  Since all of our customers are involved in the oil and natural gas industry, there may be a negative effect on our exposure to credit risk because our customers

17

Table of Contents

may be similarly affected by changes in economic and industry conditions.  For the year ended December 31, 2008, our top two customers accounted for approximately 14.4% and 12.3% of our revenues.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

The Company maintains controls and procedures to ensure that it is able to collect the information it is required to disclose in the reports it files with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and to process, summarize, and disclose this information within the time periods specified in the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Based on an evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report conducted by the Company’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers, the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers believe that these controls and procedures are effective to ensure that the Company is able to record, process, summarize, and report information required to be included in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act within the required time period.  There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting or in other factors during the quarter ended September 30, 2009, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

The Company is a defendant in various legal actions that arose or may arise out of the normal course of business.  In our opinion, none of these actions have or will result in any significant loss to us.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

For a discussion of those “Risk Factors” affecting the Company, you should carefully consider the “Risk Factors” discussed in Part I, under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, which is herein incorporated by reference.  There have been no material changes in those risk factors previously disclosed in such Annual Report.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS. - None

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES. — None.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. — None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION. — None.

18

Table of Contents

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.

The following exhibits are included herein:

*Filed herewith.

19

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

TGC INDUSTRIES, INC.

20

Table of Contents

EXHIBITS INDEX

*Filed herewith.

21

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Wayne A. Whitener, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TGC Industries, Inc.;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a.             designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.             designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c.             evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d.             disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.             all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

b.             any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, James K. Brata, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of TGC Industries, Inc.;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a.             designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.             designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c.             evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d.             disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.             all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

b.             any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of

Chief Executive Officer

of TGC Industries, Inc. Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

This certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 of TGC Industries, Inc. (the “Company”).  I, Wayne A. Whitener, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)           The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of

Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

of TGC Industries, Inc. Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

This certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 of TGC Industries, Inc. (the “Company”).  I, James K. Brata, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)           The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.